India’s work tradition simply obtained its personal cage match, and the gloves are off. Shark Tank India stars Anupam Mittal and Namita Thapar locked horns in a fiery trade over the controversial 70-hour workweek throughout an interview with People of Bombay.
Mittal known as lengthy work hours a “large lie,” whereas Thapar slammed his take as “a crock of bullsh*t.” The conflict has reignited a heated nationwide debate about productiveness, work-life steadiness, and the toll of hustle tradition in India.
Anupam Mittal, founding father of Shaadi.com, dismissed the obsession with lengthy hours, calling it “an enormous lie being advised to this technology.” Reflecting on his early days working 16-hour shifts within the U.S., Mittal argued that success stems from effort and technique, not time spent.
He cited his firm’s hybrid mannequin as proof, claiming it elevated productiveness by 30%. “Work-life steadiness is destroying an entire technology,” he said, advocating as a substitute for “work-life concord.” For Mittal, younger professionals ought to push themselves within the early years of their careers to construct character and obtain extraordinary outcomes.
Namita Thapar, CEO of Emcure Prescription drugs, fired again, labeling Mittal’s argument as a “crock of bullsh*t.” Thapar insisted that the fact for founders and workers is basically totally different. “Founders like me have important monetary stakes and might afford to work across the clock, however workers can not,” she stated. She added that demanding continuous work hours from workers can result in extreme bodily and psychological well being penalties. Thapar defined that whereas she labored grueling hours to assist take Emcure public, workers don’t share the identical monetary upside and shouldn’t be held to such expectations.
This debate stems from Infosys co-founder Narayana Murthy’s current name for India’s youth to undertake a 70-hour workweek to spice up productiveness and compete globally. Whereas Mittal champions the thought of pushing limits for achievement, Thapar argues for reasonable boundaries, highlighting the human value of overwork.
